# Sample Venture held expected result: SV-SKILL-RUN-002

Everything in this record is fictional training data. It is the separately held
expected result for evaluating a local skill; it is not real company, customer,
lead, pricing, or market evidence. Do not open it or provide it to the skill
until the fresh case has saved its recovered actual output and actual run
receipt.

## Run identity

- Run ID: `SV-SKILL-RUN-002`
- Expected-result role: `fresh-case`
- Workflow: weekly founder review
- Review window: 2026-07-21 through 2026-07-28
- Review date: `2026-07-29`
- Method version: `1.0.0`
- Owner: Sample Venture founder
- Reviewer: Sample Venture training owner
- Approval status: approved as a fictional comparison fixture

## Raw-input provenance

The raw inputs, exact source URLs, workspace destinations, handling types, and
reviewed/as-of dates are defined separately in
`skill-fixtures/fresh-case-input-manifest.md`. That manifest, not this expected
result, is the input to the skill.

## Named output

`reviews/2026-07-29-SV-SKILL-RUN-002-weekly-founder-review.md`, an internal
draft using the weekly founder review output template, plus its run receipt.

## Approved comparison result

### Facts

- The reviewed fictional lead file contained ten stable labels.
- Six records were actionable draft candidates: five marked `follow up` and one
  marked `nurture`.
- Three records were held and one was marked `do not contact`.
- The base pricing scenario used a fictional price of $1,200 and four founder
  hours per client; those values were assumptions, not market evidence.

### Interpretation and uncertainty

The fictional records were sufficient to test a draft queue, not to infer real
demand. The pricing model made capacity trade-offs visible but did not select or
approve a commercial price.

### Decisions and commitments

- Decision: keep all follow-up output draft-only pending founder review; owner
  approved.
- Commitment 1: draft only the six eligible fictional records and preserve all
  holds; owner Sample Venture founder; success evidence is a reviewed queue.
- Commitment 2: review the base price against capacity and contradiction notes;
  owner Sample Venture founder; success evidence is a signed pricing decision.
- Not doing: sending, CRM mutation, scraping, enrichment, purchasing,
  recruiting, scheduling, or publication.

## Checks and failures

- Material facts trace to named fictional inputs: pass.
- Facts, assumptions, and interpretations are separate: pass.
- Stable metric definition is present: pass.
- Holds and do-not-contact state are preserved: pass.
- No more than three commitments: pass.
- External actions: none.
- Failure or gap disclosure: no real willingness-to-pay evidence exists.

## Review boundary

Approval covers this fictional comparison result only. It does not approve a
real business decision, memory update, publication, message, purchase,
recruitment, connector, scheduled task, or external-system change.