# Sample Venture held expected result: SV-SKILL-RUN-001

Everything in this record is fictional training data. It is the separately held
expected result for evaluating a local skill; it is not real company, customer,
or market evidence. Do not open it or provide it to the skill until the known
case has saved its actual output and actual run receipt.

## Run identity

- Run ID: `SV-SKILL-RUN-001`
- Expected-result role: `known-case`
- Workflow: weekly founder review
- Review window: 2026-07-14 through 2026-07-27
- Review date: `2026-07-28`
- Method version: `1.0.0`
- Owner: Sample Venture founder
- Reviewer: Sample Venture training owner
- Approval status: approved as a fictional comparison fixture

## Raw-input provenance

The raw inputs, exact source URLs, workspace destinations, handling types, and
reviewed/as-of dates are defined separately in
`skill-fixtures/known-case-input-manifest.md`. That manifest, not this expected
result, is the input to the skill.

## Named output

`reviews/2026-07-28-SV-SKILL-RUN-001-weekly-founder-review.md`, an internal
draft using the weekly founder review output template, plus its run receipt.

## Approved comparison result

### Facts

- Five fictional interview notes passed the stated privacy and traceability
  checks.
- The venture remained at pre-launch validation stage.
- The five interviews were learning evidence, not proof of demand or
  product-market fit.

### Interpretation and uncertainty

Several fictional agency owners described scattered request intake, but the
small fictional sample did not establish willingness to pay. Pricing and
delivery capacity remained assumptions.

### Decisions and commitments

- Decision: keep the offer at bounded-pilot status; owner approved.
- Commitment 1: prepare three formula-driven pricing scenarios; owner Sample
  Venture founder; success evidence is a reviewed workbook.
- Commitment 2: classify legitimate fictional follow-up records; owner Sample
  Venture founder; success evidence is a reviewed lead file.
- Not doing: integrations, autonomous messaging, or public launch.

## Checks and failures

- Material facts trace to named fictional inputs: pass.
- Facts and interpretations are separate: pass.
- Missing prior review remains visible: pass.
- No more than three commitments: pass.
- External actions: none.
- Failure or gap disclosure: willingness to pay and delivery feasibility remain
  unresolved.

## Review boundary

Approval covers this fictional comparison result only. It does not approve a
real business decision, memory update, publication, message, purchase,
recruitment, connector, schedule, or external-system change.